Brownfield Renewal
  • Current Issue
    Check out the latest issue of Brownfield Renewal Magazine!
  • Virtual Edition
    See the Virtual Edition of Brownfield Renewal Magazine!
  • Renewal Awards
    Click here to see the winners!

- banner1



 
    2009 Winners   
    2009 Nominees   
    2009 Judges   
    2010 Nominations   




Menomonee Valley Industrial Center
WINNER - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
4.What was most challenging about the project?
The most challenging aspect was the fact that the physical site conditions inherited with the Shops parcel caused challenging economic conditions for the redevelopment. Redevelopment at the MVIC involved safely remediating various environmental impacts from over 125 years of industrial use (petroleum-, chlorinated solvent-, heavy metal-, and asbestos-related contamination; contaminated runoff to the Menomonee River); and effectively mitigating miles of subsurface utilities and vaults; addressing stability issues inherent with organic, floodplain soils; and uplifting a parcel situated within the 100-year floodplain. Given this redevelopment's size, location, and political stature, the expectation of producing economic success at the redevelopment within a quick time frame added the final element of challenge. Innovative solutions used by the MVIC project team not only met these challenges, but in many cases achieved both environmental and financial benefits.

The location of the site within the 100-year floodplain was solved using a creative agreement with Wisconsin Department of Transportation to provide fill from their nearby interchange construction work, with a financial benefit of generating $1.5 million in tipping fees for the project and beneficial re-use of 700,000 cubic yards of material otherwise destined for construction or special waste landfills. The contaminated soil, groundwater, subsurface utilities, and building debris were remediated using onsite containment processes which were possible because of proactive and collaborative engagement of stakeholders and via value engineering throughout the program's lifecycle. Financial benefits of solving this challenge included a $10 million savings in offsite management and disposal costs, $120MM in ecological/recreational/aesthetic uplift, $1.5MM in imported fill revenue, and most importantly, a highly impacted, blighted parcel that has been transformed into a thriving development which has so far created over 700 sustained jobs, with a projection for 1200 when the development is complete.The challenge of providing a stormwater facility for the previously-contaminated parcel that met surface water quality standards was met using an innovative subsurface stormwater reservoir/treatment facility. The facility uses natural materials to treat all stormwater from 60 acres of the development area-cleaning water to a quality that exceeds all discharge requirements and providing a facility so that individual developers do not need their own stormwater systems.

5.Did the project receive any loans, grants or financial assistance from any public or private organizations?
  • State grants were provided by the Wisconsin Department of Commerce and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) for infrastructure establishment, environmental cleanup and community park development. State Stewardship Funds were used for the creation of the Hank Aaron State Trail.
     
  • Federal grants were received from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, U.S. EPA, and the Economic Development Administration.
6.Could you describe the collaboration that occurred among multiple parties to enable the project to excel?
RACM wasn't alone in the MVIC effort-group cooperation, coordination, and collaboration built strong alliances among industry, community, and local government agencies. Menomonee Valley Partners, Inc. (MVP), a local nonprofit organization, coordinated monetary and in-kind support from the local community. Before the City took ownership of the site, MVP held public meetings to gather ideas for site redevelopment. A National Design Competition was held to create the development framework. Since then, through scores of public workshops, charrettes, and meetings, input has been gathered from hundreds of people representing a wide variety of constituencies: environmental consultants, bicyclists, birdwatchers, soccer players, neighborhood residents and neighboring businesses, engineers, ecologists, and environmental scientists. Input or continued involvement has come from all of these groups:

  • Menomonee Valley Partners, Inc.
  • Milwaukee Transportation Partners (including CH2M HILL and HNTB)
  • Friends of Hank Aaron State Trail
  • Milwaukee Riverkeepers
  • Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District
  • Bicycle Federation of Wisconsin
  • Urban Ecology Center (UEC)
  • Merrill Park Neighborhood Association
  • Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
  • Wisconsin Department of Transportation
  • Layton Boulevard West Neighbors
  • Sixteenth Street Community Health Center
  • Menomonee Valley Business Association
  • Business Improvement District #26
  • Urban Open Space Foundation
  • Marquette University-Milwaukee
  • University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
  • The real estate brokerage community
  • AmeriCorps volunteer corps
The goal is to have a steady community voice for project progress through the next several years, and to develop and nurture community leaders who have a strong sense of connection to and ownership of the new public space and can serve as ambassadors to the greater neighborhood. Regular Valley events keep the community engaged in the work of building and maintaining a new shared asset. Annual Earth Day cleanup, Community Planting Days, and Run/Walk events keep people involved.

In addition, the City went through great efforts to engage small disadvantaged businesses throughout planning, design, and construction. With workforce development as one of the City's key objectives, pre-construction workshops were conducted, mentoring relationships were formed with larger contractors, and aspiring trade workers, scientists, and engineers were enlisted via the job service corp and the Mayor's youth internship program. These efforts resulted in an un-precedented 34% small disadvantaged business participation, and even more significantly, enhanced the capabilities and the resumes of these companies so they can now pursue a greater portfolio of job opportunities in the area.

7.What type of innovative designs and energy-efficient technologies were implemented?
The most innovative component of the MVIC redevelopment project has to be the design and construction of a subsurface stormwater reservoir/treatment facility that uses natural and recycled materials to collect and treat all runoff from 60 acres of the development area, offering an attractive alternative to traditional stormwater development requirements and cleaning the stormwater flows into the Menomonee River. This facility was designed and constructed with a system of vertical infiltration zones and subsurface conveyance layers built with recycled materials. The basins in the system use a permeable soil medium over a compacted clay subgrade to maximize stormwater absorption and vegetative uptake

This design removes sediments, road salt, and contaminants from stormwater runoff through both filtration and biological processes-- removing a minimum of 80 percent of total suspended solids as well as sodium, phosphorus, nitrogen and heavy metals. The system's surficial "bioretention" basins are planted with native vegetation to maximize evapotranspiration and reduce the volume of stormwater runoff. The system is augmented by sediment traps at pipe inlets to minimize maintenance of the wetlands and improve the quality of the ecosystems that can be maintained. The last basin in the series is a swamp forest that receives the treated stormwater and then disperses it into the Menomonee River via baseflow rather than overland flow.

8.What recyclable materials were used to classify this as a 'green' development?
The design and construction using recycled materials to meet a "Beneficial Reuse" focus included:
  • Demolition and onsite management of more than 120,000 cubic yards of asbestos-containing building debris into landscaped mounds.
     
  • 700,000 cubic yards of fill imported from local highway project to raise site (generated more than $1.5 million in revenue).
  • 20,000 cubic yards of crushed concrete used in stormwater treatment facility structures and construction roads; excess sold to developers for foundation subgrade.
  • Recycled glass panels used in trail and pathway railings.
  • Former stockyard beams used to construct park benches and tables for the greenspace areas.
  • Grubbed vegetation chipped and used in topsoil.
  • Milwaukee region's "Cream City" brick from historical fill incorporated into present-day landscaping.
  • Two historic smokestacks preserved as a marker of the site's industrial past-integrated into a park "gathering place."

 
Page: 2 / 2
 

Send Your Feedback

Click here to expand the feedback form



  Industry Profiles
Aaron Scheff Aaron Scheff
Brownfield Response Program Manager, Idaho Dept. of Environmental Quality
Idaho

Andrea Reveile Andrea Reveile
Vice President, A & R Demolition
Del Valle, Texas

Becky Holmes Becky Holmes
Hazardous Waste Brownfields Coordinator, Montana DEQ
Montana






  Current Issue
June 2010
Brownfield Renewal June 2010 The color of money: ‘Building green’
Cover StoryBy Elizabeth Brewster

Thanks to ever-rising fuel prices and a renewed federal commitment to sustainable construction, green building practices and technologies …



 ‘Green on Brown’: The Industry’s Lifeblood
 A Green Cleanup That’s ‘Tree-mendous’
 An Avenue of Recovery: CERCLA Versus the Dept. of Defense


  Archives


 - 
   All Archives  

   Virtual Edition  

Count On It
 $49,000 amount of federal funds granted to provide green job training for high school students in New Mexico. The projects will teach students climate change mitigation techniques and provide educational tools for a green workforce.
Source U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
 30% of the energy used in commercial buildings is wasted. Energy use in commercial buildings accounts for 17 percent of total U.S. greenhouse gas emissions at a cost of more than $100 billion per year.
Source U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
 14% increase in the amount of greenhouse gas emissions from human activities in the U.S. between 1990 and 2008.
Source U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
 $76 million  amount awarded by DOE to support advanced energy-efficient building technology projects and the development of training programs for commercial building equipment technicians, building operators, and energy auditors
Source U.S. Department of Energy
 $200 million amount the U.S. Department of Energy will invest, over five years, to expand and accelerate the development, commercialization, and use of solar and water power technologies throughout the U.S.
Source U.S. Department of Energy
 37 number of research projects awarded $106 million from the DOE that could: produce biofuels more efficiently from renew-able electricity; design batteries for electric vehicles; and remove coal-fired power plants in cost efficient ways.
Source U.S. Department of Energy
 $2 million amount of grant competition under the Veterans. Workforce Investment Program to assist eligible veterans by providing employment, training, support services, and more in renewable and sustainable energy.
Source U.S. Department of Labor